中学受験一般の英語最高峰慶應・SFC中2019文法解説

■2023年度エッセイYou must send a capsule into outer space that includes three things to teach aliens about the people of planet Earth. What would you include in your capsule?Sending a capsule into outer space to teach aliens about the people of planet Earth is an exciting opportunity to showcase the essence of humanity. If I were tasked with selecting three items, I would include a representation of diversity, a symbol of peace and respect, and a question about our shared history. These items would be a documentary of a diverse American elementary school, a judogi (judo uniform), and Materials related to the Hiroshima Peace Dome. Each item would highlight unique aspects of humanity and our quest for understanding. First, I would include a documentary showcasing a diverse American elementary school. During my time in the United States, I attended a school where students from various ethnicities and cultures studied together. This environment taught me the beauty of diversity and how people from different backgrounds can coexist and learn from one another. A documentary of such a school would reveal to extraterrestrial beings how humans celebrate diversity and strive for inclusion. This film would show not just the academic activities but also the meaningful interactions among students, reflecting humanity’s aspiration to embrace differences. Second, I would include a judo uniform, which represents the values of strength, respect, and discipline. I practiced judo while living in the United States and learned that this martial art is not merely about physical strength but also about respecting one’s opponent and striving for personal growth. Although I paused my practice in sixth grade to focus on studying for entrance exams, I hope to join the judo club in middle school. Judo’s philosophy aligns with the Olympic spirit of unity and peace, making it a fitting item to represent humanity’s commitment to harmony and mutual respect. Lastly, I would include a replica of the Hiroshima Peace Dome along with a documentary about Hiroshima’s recovery. In my history class in the United States, we discussed whether there can ever be a "just war" and used Hiroshima as a case study. This open-ended discussion left us without a definitive answer but emphasized the importance of asking challenging questions. The Peace Dome and the documentary would show aliens that humanity not only learns from its past but also values questioning and dialogue to shape a better future. By including these items, we could share a message of resilience and the necessity of critical thinking in addressing complex issues. Through these three items—a school documentary, a judo uniform, and the materials related to Hiroshima Peace Dome—the capsule would convey the values of diversity, peace, and the importance of questions. My experiences as a returnee student, growing up in a multicultural environment and grappling with difficult questions about history and ethics, have taught me to value understanding, respect, and curiosity. I believe these qualities define humanity and would resonate with beings from another world, sparking their interest in who we are and what we strive to become. ■2024年度エッセイImagine a society in which money is not used. Would life be better or worse?Model Essay 1Money has been a cornerstone of human civilization for centuries, serving as a medium of exchange, a measure of value, and a store of wealth. Yet, it is worth contemplating whether life would be better in a society where money did not exist. This essay argues that a society without money would lead to better outcomes by fostering equality, promoting genuine community cooperation, and reducing stress associated with financial pressures.  First and foremost, the elimination of money would create a more equitable society. In the current monetary system, wealth disparity is one of the major contributors to social inequality. The rich enjoy privileges and opportunities that the poor can only dream of, leading to systemic injustices. A society without money would remove the primary mechanism through which such disparities manifest, allowing everyone equal access to resources and opportunities. For example, instead of being limited by financial constraints, individuals could acquire necessities and pursue education or healthcare based on need, ensuring a fairer distribution of resources. Secondly, a money-free society would encourage genuine cooperation within communities. Without financial incentives driving human interactions, people would be more likely to collaborate out of mutual respect and shared goals. This could lead to stronger social bonds and a more cohesive society. For instance, bartering and communal resource-sharing systems would incentivize individuals to contribute their skills and talents for the benefit of all. A farmer might provide food in exchange for a teacher’s educational services, fostering a direct and meaningful connection between individuals that is often absent in monetary transactions.  Another significant advantage of a society without money is the potential reduction in stress and anxiety associated with financial concerns. In today’s world, many individuals are burdened by debts, job insecurity, and the constant pressure to earn more. This stress often leads to mental health issues, including anxiety and depression. A society without money would eliminate these pressures, enabling individuals to focus on personal growth, creativity, and relationships. For example, instead of working tirelessly to pay bills, people could dedicate their time to meaningful pursuits and contribute to society in ways that align with their passions and talents. Admittedly, transitioning to a money-free society would present challenges, such as determining how to allocate resources effectively and preventing exploitation of the system. However, these obstacles can be addressed through careful planning and the establishment of robust governance structures that prioritize fairness and sustainability. The potential benefits of equality, cooperation, and reduced stress far outweigh the difficulties of implementation. In conclusion, a society without money has the potential to create a more harmonious and fulfilling way of life. By eliminating the inequalities perpetuated by wealth, fostering genuine cooperation, and alleviating financial stress, such a system could allow humanity to thrive in unprecedented ways. While challenges exist, they are not insurmountable and should not deter us from envisioning a world where resources and opportunities are accessible to all, regardless of economic status. Model Essay 2Money has been a cornerstone of human civilization for centuries, serving as a medium of exchange, a measure of value, and a store of wealth. However, it is also essential to consider how life might become worse in a society without money. This essay argues that a society without money would lead to new forms of inequality, widespread confusion, and reduced efficiency, ultimately making life more challenging. First and foremost, a society without money could create new forms of inequality. Without money, bartering and the exchange of services would become the primary methods of trade. This system could result in some individuals having significantly more resources than others. For instance, a farmer capable of producing large quantities of food might accumulate more wealth compared to individuals unable to provide valuable skills or labor. Money standardizes value and ensures fair exchanges, preventing the imbalances inherent in direct trade.

Secondly, a moneyless society would likely experience widespread confusion. Money functions as a universal and efficient medium of exchange, but without it, transactions would require complex negotiations. For example, if someone desires bread but possesses only wood, the trade can occur only if the baker needs wood. Such mismatched exchanges would occur frequently, leading to societal chaos and a significant decline in efficiency. Furthermore, the lack of money would reduce efficiency and stagnate economic activities. In the current monetary system, money facilitates the quick and efficient allocation of resources and labor. In contrast, a barter-based system would complicate transactions, requiring immense time and effort. For instance, individuals might need to engage in multiple stages of trade to obtain a desired service or product. This inefficiency could hinder productivity and slow societal progress. Of course, a moneyless society might possess some idealistic aspects. For example, it could inspire efforts to eliminate economic inequality or foster a greater sense of community solidarity. However, achieving these ideals would require extraordinarily high levels of trust and transparency, which would be challenging to maintain in reality. In conclusion, a society without money is likely to face significant challenges that would make life more difficult. New forms of inequality, societal confusion, and reduced efficiency are practical issues that such a society would confront. Money is not merely a physical tool; it is a vital mechanism that enables society to function smoothly. Its absence could disrupt the stability and progress we often take for granted. Model Essay 3Studying at an American school provided me with the unique opportunity to immerse myself in a multicultural environment. This experience helped me develop a strong sense of responsibility, proactivity, effective communication skills, and an appreciation for diversity. These qualities have taught me that there are values far greater than money. I envision a world where society is guided by these higher principles, and I aspire to contribute to such a world through my work. One of the most impactful moments that shaped my perspective was a discussion with my Mexican friend, Paulo, whom I met at school. Paulo, deeply aware of the poverty in his home country, shared his thoughts: “When you think about Mexico’s struggles, it’s hard not to prioritize money. However, when I consider Mexico’s future, I can’t ignore the importance of our traditions and culture—things that cannot be measured by money. Ultimately, we must cherish values that cannot be defined by monetary worth.” His words deeply resonated with me and strengthened my belief in prioritizing intangible values. While I do not yet have a concrete economic alternative for a world without money, I firmly believe that collaboration, creativity, and shared human connections can drive society forward. During middle school, I led a cultural festival project that encouraged cross-cultural exchange. Students shared their traditions and stories, fostering deep understanding and solidarity. This experience showed me that human connections and shared experiences hold a value far greater than material wealth. I am also deeply committed to becoming a United Nations staff member. This goal stems from my desire to bring my beliefs into reality and collaborate with people worldwide to build a better future. Paulo’s insight about balancing economic challenges with preserving cultural and traditional values aligns with my vision. At the United Nations, I believe it is possible to work with individuals from diverse backgrounds to create solutions that go beyond monetary frameworks and prioritize humanity’s collective well-being. In today’s world, monetary value often takes precedence in many areas of life. However, I firmly believe that empathy, creativity, and cooperation are the keys to building a sustainable and fulfilling society. These values, far from being commodities, are the driving forces behind meaningful relationships and long-lasting impact. My commitment to these principles has shaped my aspirations and continues to fuel my determination to work toward an ideal world. Ultimately, I strive to live a life that values meaningful human connections, cultural understanding, and personal growth. I believe these principles provide a deeper sense of fulfillment and influence than material wealth ever could.  

渋幕2023/2024英語エッセイ解答例

■長文読解の本文It is, of course, an indispensable part of a scrivener’s business to verify the accuracy of his copy, word by word. Where there are two or more scriveners in an office, they assist each other in this examination, one reading from the copy, the other holding the original. It is a very dull, wearisome, and lethargic affair. I can readily imagine that to some sanguine temperaments it would be altogether intolerable. For example, I cannot credit that the mettlesome poet Byron would have contentedly sat down with Bartleby to examine a law document of, say five hundred pages, closely written in a crimpy hand. Now and then, in the haste of business, it had been my habit to assist in comparing some brief document myself, calling Turkey or Nippers for this purpose. One object I had in placing Bartleby so handy to me behind the screen, was to avail myself of his services on such trivial occasions. It was on the third day, I think, of his being with me, and before any necessity had arisen for having his own writing examined, that, being much hurried to complete a small affair I had in hand, I abruptly called to Bartleby. In my haste and natural expectancy of instant compliance, I sat with my head bent over the original on my desk, and my right hand sideways, and somewhat nervously extended with the copy, so that immediately upon emerging from his retreat, Bartleby might snatch it and proceed to business without the least delay. In this very attitude did I sit when I called to him, rapidly stating what it was I wanted him to do—namely, to examine a small paper with me. Imagine my surprise, nay, my consternation, when without moving from his privacy, Bartleby in a singularly mild, firm voice, replied, “I would prefer not to.” I sat awhile in perfect silence, rallying my stunned faculties. Immediately it occurred to me that my ears had deceived me, or Bartleby had entirely misunderstood my meaning. I repeated my request in the clearest tone I could assume. But in quite as clear a one came the previous reply, “I would prefer not to.” “Prefer not to,” echoed I, rising in high excitement, and crossing the room with a stride. “What do you mean? Are you moon-struck? I want you to help me compare this sheet here—take it,” and I thrust it towards him. “I would prefer not to,” said he. I looked at him steadfastly. His face was leanly composed; his gray eye dimly calm. Not a wrinkle of agitation rippled him. Had there been the least uneasiness, anger, impatience or impertinence in his manner; in other words, had there been any thing ordinarily human about him, doubtless I should have violently dismissed him from the premises. But as it was, I should have as soon thought of turning my pale plaster-of-paris bust of Cicero out of doors. I stood gazing at him awhile, as he went on with his own writing, and then reseated myself at my desk. This is very strange, thought I. What had one best do? But my business hurried me. I concluded to forget the matter for the present, reserving it for my future leisure. So calling Nippers from the other room, the paper was speedily examined. A few days after this, Bartleby concluded four lengthy documents, being quadruplicates of a week’s testimony taken before me in my High Court of Chancery. It became necessary to examine them. It was an important suit, and great accuracy was imperative. Having all things arranged I called Turkey, Nippers and Ginger Nut from the next room, meaning to place the four copies in the hands of my four clerks, while I should read from the original. Accordingly, Turkey, Nippers and Ginger Nut had taken their seats in a row, each with his document in hand, when I called to Bartleby to join this interesting group. “Bartleby! quick, I am waiting.” I heard a slow scrape of his chair legs on the uncarpeted floor, and soon he appeared standing at the entrance of his hermitage. “What is wanted?” said he mildly. “The copies, the copies,” said I hurriedly. “We are going to examine them. There”—and I held towards him the fourth quadruplicate.
“I would prefer not to,” he said, and gently disappeared behind the screen. For a few moments I was turned into a pillar of salt, standing at the head of my seated column of clerks. Recovering myself, I advanced towards the screen, and demanded the reason for such extraordinary conduct. “Why do you refuse?” “I would prefer not to.” With any other man I should have flown outright into a dreadful passion, scorned all further words, and thrust him ignominiously from my presence. But there was something about Bartleby that not only strangely disarmed me, but in a wonderful manner touched and disconcerted me. I began to reason with him. “These are your own copies we are about to examine. It is labor saving to you, because one examination will answer for your four papers. It is common usage. Every copyist is bound to help examine his copy. Is it not so? Will you not speak? Answer!” “I prefer not to,” he replied in a flute-like tone. It seemed to me that while I had been addressing him, he carefully revolved every statement that I made; fully comprehended the meaning; could not gainsay the irresistible conclusions; but, at the same time, some paramount consideration prevailed with him to reply as he did. “You are decided, then, not to comply with my request—a request made according to common usage and common sense?”
He briefly gave me to understand that on that point my judgment was sound. Yes: his decision was irreversible.詩の読解Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary, Over many a strange and forgotten book of lore— While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping, As of someone gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door. “’Tis some visitor,” I muttered, “tapping at my chamber door— Only this and nothing more.”

Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December, And the fire’s dying embers cast shadows upon the floor. I longed for relief from sorrow—sorrow for the lost Lenore— For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore— Nameless here for evermore.  Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before. But the silence gave no answer, and the stillness offered no clue, Till the only word I whispered was the name, “Lenore.” And an echo softly murmured back the word, “Lenore!”— Merely this and nothing more.  Open wide I flung the shutter, when, with flapping wings and thunder, In there stepped a solemn Raven, from the shadowy days of yore. Perched upon a bust above me, it sat silent, dark, and grim— And the only word it uttered was the chilling “Nevermore.”  “Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil—bird or devil, dark and haunting! By the God we both believe in, tell me—shall I hold Lenore? In the distant land of heaven, shall I clasp her to my heart?” Quoth the Raven “Nevermore.” 

渋渋直前予想テスト　本文公開

慶應SFC中2019英文法問題の解答解説動画

■このブログをもとにした「シン・帰国生の英語受験ガイド」発売中！
「英検２級、準1級、１級ホルダーの小学生が英語で中学受験をするのなら国語と英語を同時並行で進めると世界が広がる本」
https://amzn.asia/d/bG6XWpd

■指導経歴
1993年：株式会社早稲田アカデミー高円寺校(杉並区)に非常勤講師として勤務開始
1998年：木場校に異動
1999年：専任講師へと契約変更
2001年：雪が谷大塚校(大田区)に校長として異動
　＊早慶必勝コース　英語担当
2004年：非常勤講師に契約変更（